fundregtracker.
Last verified 2026-07-09

The Investment Company Act of 1940 (US, 15 U.S.C. 80a)

United States·primary law·in force, as amended

Ask the law

Ask a plain question about fund regulation. The answer is built only from the mined legal text, with every point cited to the exact Article — or an honest “not covered”. Not legal advice.

How must US funds determine fair value under Rule 2a-5?What must a US fund liquidity risk management program cover?How must a US registered fund hold its securities in custody?
Official text
Investment Company Act of 1940 (GovInfo compiled statute, 15 U.S.C. §80a)
Status
in force, as amended (the GovInfo compilation is the current consolidated text)
Jurisdiction
United States (federal)
Type
primary law
This page
summary only. The linked Act is the source

The Investment Company Act is the US statute that governs pooled investment vehicles offered to the public: mutual funds, closed-end funds and unit investment trusts. It does so through registration with the SEC and a dense set of structural rules. Its definition of an "investment company" (§3) is deliberately wide. That is exactly why the private-fund world is built around its exclusions (§3(c)(1) and §3(c)(7)). A fund that cannot fit an exclusion must register and accept the full regime. That means independent-director governance, custody of assets and strict limits on transactions with affiliates (§17). It also means hard limits on leverage and capital structure (§18). It pairs with the Investment Advisers Act, which regulates the manager.

Scope and the core mechanism

The Act works off the §3 definition of "investment company" and then a set of exclusions. Public funds register and live inside the regime. Private funds are built to rely on an exclusion. The most common are §3(c)(1) (no more than 100 beneficial owners) and §3(c)(7) (only "qualified purchasers"). For registered funds the substance is structural protection of investors. That means a board with independent directors, custody requirements and tight controls on affiliated transactions (§17). It also means constraints on senior securities / leverage (§18), with daily NAV-based pricing. The full section text is searchable clause by clause through the Graph of rules and ask-the-law.

In practice: for a private fund the Act is a statute you spend your time avoiding, not complying with. The whole structuring exercise is fitting a §3(c) exclusion and never stepping outside it (investor counts, qualified-purchaser status, integration). Lose the exclusion and the entire registered-fund regime lands on you at once.

To verify

  • §3(c)(1) / §3(c)(7) conditions: confirm the current beneficial-owner count, qualified-purchaser definitions and integration rules against the compiled Act and SEC rules for a specific structure.
  • §18 leverage limits: confirm the current asset-coverage ratios and the treatment of derivatives (SEC Rule 18f-4) before relying on the headline limits.

Ask a question about this law

Get an article-cited answer built only from the mined legal text — or an honest “not covered”.

Ask the law →
↑ Top