FundRegTracker
The living tracker of fund regulation — Luxembourg · Ireland · UK · Jersey · Guernsey · US data
Last verified: 2026-07-07

The UCITS Directive — Directive 2009/65/EC

Official text: EUR-Lex — Directive 2009/65/EC (consolidated), as amended by Directive 2014/91/EU and Directive (EU) 2024/927 · Status: in force, as amended — liquidity-management-tool changes apply from 16 April 2026 · Jurisdiction: EU (directive — transposed into national law) · Type: EU directive · This page: summary only — the linked text is the law.

UCITS is the EU's harmonised RETAIL fund regime — a diversified, liquid fund that, once authorised in its home member state, can be sold to retail investors right across the EU on that single authorisation. The bargain is explicit: strict eligible-asset and diversification limits in exchange for the retail passport. Stay inside the box and you get a pan-EU distribution licence no other fund wrapper gives you; the price is that you cannot hold what you like, in the size you like.

Scope and the core mechanism

UCITS is a directive — an EU law that binds member states to a result but not to the wording; each state transposes it (writes it into its own national statute, e.g. Luxembourg's or Ireland's fund law) rather than applying it directly. So the rules you actually work to are national, but they trace back to one common text — which is what makes the passport possible. The design has three legs: the fund must be liquid (redeemable on demand, so retail investors can get out), diversified (no concentrated single-name risk), and eligible-asset-constrained (broadly, only listed/liquid instruments). Meet all three and you earn the payoff: authorise once at home, market everywhere in the EU. Contrast this with AIFMD, which regulates the manager of alternative (professional-investor) funds and lets the product hold almost anything — UCITS regulates the product and is built for the retail world.

Key provisions

ProvisionWhat it saysThe practical point
Eligible assets (Art. 50)A UCITS may invest only in defined categories: transferable securities and money-market instruments admitted to/dealt on regulated markets, bank deposits, units of other UCITS/eligible collective schemes, and financial derivative instruments.The universe is "listed and liquid" by design. Unlisted equity, physical real estate and direct loans do not fit — that's the AIF/ELTIF world, not UCITS.
Diversification — the 5/10/40 rule (Art. 52)Max 5% of NAV in transferable securities/MMIs of one issuer, raisable to 10%, provided that the total of all holdings above 5% does not exceed 40% of NAV. Combined exposure to one body (securities + deposits + derivative counterparty risk) is capped, with higher 20%/35% variants for specific cases.The 40% aggregate cap is the real bite — it stops you filling the book with a handful of 9%+ names. Build the model around it, not just the headline 10%.
Liquidity / redemptionUnits must be repurchased or redeemed at the request of holders; redemption is expected at least twice monthly. Directive (EU) 2024/927 adds a harmonised menu of liquidity-management tools (LMTs).You must select and hard-wire at least two LMTs (e.g. swing pricing, redemption gates, notice periods, anti-dilution levy) into fund documents — see the amendment table.
Depositary (Art. 22–24)A single depositary safe-keeps assets and monitors cash flows. Post-UCITS V, the depositary carries near-strict liability for the loss of financial instruments held in custody and must return them or their value."Near-strict liability" means the depositary is on the hook for lost custody assets even without fault, barring a narrow external-event carve-out. It prices into your custody fee.
Management company + passportAn authorised UCITS management company can passport its services across the EU, and the fund itself notifies into other member states to be marketed there.One home-state authorisation, EU-wide distribution — the whole reason to wear the UCITS constraints in the first place.
Investor disclosureA prospectus plus a pre-contractual key information document (the PRIIPs KID for retail investors) must be provided.The KID is a hard gate on retail marketing — no compliant KID, no retail sale. Treat it as a launch dependency, not paperwork.

Amendment history

DateInstrumentWhat changed
13 Jul 2009Directive 2009/65/EC (recast)The consolidated UCITS regime — eligible assets, the 5/10/40 diversification rules, depositary, management-company passport, retail disclosure.
23 Jul 2014Directive 2014/91/EU (UCITS V)Depositary functions and near-strict liability tightened; remuneration-policy rules for management companies; harmonised administrative sanctions.
13 Mar 2024Directive (EU) 2024/927Amended UCITS alongside AIFMD ("AIFMD II") — harmonised liquidity-management tools, plus delegation, reporting and depositary changes.
16 Apr 2026Application of the 2024/927 changes + Level 2 RTSTransposition/application date for the LMT regime; Commission Delegated Regulation (RTS) specifying the tools' characteristics applies, with a one-year transition (to 16 Apr 2027) for funds constituted before 16 Apr 2026. Final OJ number of the RTS — see To verify.

What it works with

UCITS is the retail pole of EU fund regulation; almost everything it "works with" defines itself against it. Start with the UCITS glossary for the vocabulary, then the AIFMD II tracker — the 2026 liquidity-management-tool changes are the shared thread stitching the two regimes together, so if you run both UCITS and AIFs the LMT work is one project, not two. The depositary page unpacks the custody-liability model that UCITS V tightened. When a strategy won't fit the UCITS box — private assets, loans, real estate — you cross into the alternative world: ELTIF 2.0 vs Part II covers the retail-eligible-but-illiquid options, and the domicile comparison covers where to site the vehicle. Rule of thumb: UCITS = liquid + retail + product-regulated; AIF = illiquid-capable + professional + manager-regulated.

The gotcha: the 5/10/40 limits are tested at the point of investment, not continuously — so a breach caused purely by market movement (a holding that grows past its limit because it rallied) is a passive breach, treated differently from an active one you caused by trading. Passive breaches carry a remediation window: the priority is to correct them in the unit-holders' interest, not to dump the position the same day. Confusing the two — force-selling a passive breach — can itself harm investors and is a classic new-operator error.

To verify

Changelog